Subtitle for NY Times Story: "Or Why We've got to Defeat Obama"
Charge: Listen to this. The New York Times, a very sad New York Times: "As New Graduates Return to Nest, Economy Also Feels the Sadden -- Like most of her friends, Hollis Romanelli graduated from college last May and promptly moved back in with her parents. As a sequel, she didn’t pay rent -- or a broker’s fee or renters’ insurance, for that matter. She also didn’t buy a bed, desk, day-bed, doormat, mop or new crockery set." How insulting to think that's what a woman would go buy? You got a female graduate here in the era of feminazi-ism and they're ill at ease about the fact she didn't go buy a doormat, a mop or a crockery set? And a woman wrote this, Catherine Rampell. How insulting. This is a parable about how these new graduates are not just harming themselves and how they're being harmed, but the whole economy is being harmed because they're not buying all this stuff for themselves because they're not earning any mazuma.
I just find it hilarious that of all the things a female college graduate could be lamented for not being able to buy, a mop? Why not pitch an ironing board in there? A crockery set? How about a fondue machine? I don't know what a crockery set is. I definitely don't know. It sounds like something you get a Williams-Sonoma. (interruption) I don't protection. All I know is the New York Times is unhappy that this female graduate can't go buy one. What do I care what a crockery set is?
