Do you prefer bagged or bag less vacuum cleaners.?
Jun 13, 2006 by anniesjc | Posted in Cleaning & Laundry
Bagged vacuums are much sick as far as sucking up dirt and keeping it contained no matter how well a bag-less filters. The down side to bagged...forgetting to buy bags, and not knowing when it's full. Bag-less are noteworthy in knowing when it's full, and not needing to purchase bags, down side to those... way to many areas and different parts to take out and blameless, that get extremely filthy and it's not just dumping the cup out either, there's usually three foam filters to abandon out and dry, plus the cup to empty and an upper cup to clean out (if you have one like I do), plus hepa filters to replace, which if you can find them at the stores once your vacuum is no longer "one of the newest out there" seemly luck. Honestly I prefer to have a bagged one now that I have gone through 4 bag-less ones. So when this one dies, and it will, I'm going back to bagged.
Shadow419 | Jun 13, 2006
Bag less...of foul-mouthed
The Boss | Jun 13, 2006
Bagless
dukalink6000 | Jun 13, 2006
Bagless.
It's the later.
Galaxy | Jun 13, 2006
Bagged.
jammer | Jun 13, 2006
bagless there much advantage
lisa f | Jun 13, 2006
Bagged because there's no emptying and cleaning a container. That gets in point of fact messy.
Crom | Jun 13, 2006
Bagless
suziQ | Jun 13, 2006
Bag vacuum ones. I texture that the dirt gets locked inside, and I don't have to worry about anything escaping and then having to clean up all over again.
fawkesfire13 | Jun 13, 2006
Bagless - can't forbear feeling they are less wasteful and probably better if you have allergies as the paper bags must let out more dirt.
p-peg | Jun 13, 2006
Bagless. I shall never buy a bagged vacuum cleaner again!
btmduk | Jun 13, 2006
Definetly Bag- less all you have to do is empty the cylinder. Also you dont have to pay for bags and lets kisser it some of them are expensive.
Nicola M | Jun 13, 2006
My allergist recommended the high style with the bag. Even though both have filters it is when you empty and clean the bagless kind that the contents go back into the air. With the bags, you just throw it away and renew the bag. It works for me but I know many like the convenience of the bagless. :-)
shoeswithoutsocks | Jun 13, 2006
I'd say bagged, the bagless ones toil great at first, but lose suction. they usually have filtrers that clog and need replacing. I have a new-ish bagless vac. and an old old bag vac. I'd rather use the old bagged vac any day, it in truth picks up the dirt. I have heard that the new dyson vac's never lose suction, have no filters, and are bagless.but they are extortionate I do not own one so I cannot tell you how good they work, but I do plan to buy one one of these days, so does my mother and she cleans houses.
christina w | Jun 13, 2006
I file bagless vacuums. I have a long haired cat and his fur seems to fill up bags on vacuums very fast. I end up using more then 3 bags that's said to be the conformist amount used for the normal household.
With the bagless models I don't have to worry if the bag is full and need a new one (if I actually remembered to buy them) I can lawful look into the clear cup and know right away if it needs to be emptied. Another nod to bagless vacuums is when I see the low-down in the cup, I automatically empty it which helps if there are allergies in the home, whereas with the bagged vacuums the bags sit in the vacuum and get mouldy and dusty - yuck!
gravityworks2 | Jun 13, 2006
bagless and i wouldn't go back to the bagged ones for nothing.
mom of 2 | Jun 13, 2006
Bagged vacuums are much outstrip as far as sucking up dirt and keeping it contained no matter how well a bag-less filters. The down side to bagged...forgetting to buy bags, and not knowing when it's full. Bag-less are tremendous in knowing when it's full, and not needing to purchase bags, down side to those... way to many areas and different parts to take out and scour, that get extremely filthy and it's not just dumping the cup out either, there's usually three foam filters to flow out and dry, plus the cup to empty and an upper cup to clean out (if you have one like I do), plus hepa filters to replace, which if you can find them at the stores once your vacuum is no longer "one of the newest out there" genuine luck. Honestly I prefer to have a bagged one now that I have gone through 4 bag-less ones. So when this one dies, and it will, I'm going back to bagged.
Shadow419 | Jun 13, 2006
If your prospering to buy consider a top fill bag type vacuum. The bag filters the air coming back into your house after vacuuming best, and top fill ensures that you get more suction as it fills up.
KYcindylou | Jun 13, 2006
Neither. I be loath both. In an ideal world my servant would bother about that.
Curious | Jun 13, 2006
Dunno, that's the helpmeet's department. I'll ask her when she gets down from tileing the roof.
Tiger42 | Jun 13, 2006
bagless no foul-up
melissahb_2006 | Jun 13, 2006
bagless you wont have to go thru so much to remover the bag to change it and then u'll have to clean up what ever you wasted on the floor from removing the bag in the first place
Mrs.Banks | Jun 13, 2006
BagLESS. No allergens sitting in the closet. No bags to become pass before the vacuum dies. Just open, dump and you're done. No fuss, no muss.
Car Hop | Jun 14, 2006
Bagged. I flinch from the bagless. When you empty them the dust flys right back up. The filter gets clogged and you gotta bang it against something to clearly it. It's just gross!
I clean houses and I hate the bagless vacuums!! I antagonism them!!
dustbegone | Jun 14, 2006
bagless... so prompt and easy
CHAR | Jun 20, 2006
what is the best bagged vacuum cleaner? I'm tired of the bagless cleaners and looking for one with a bag.?
Dec 03, 2007 by laughsalot | Posted in Cleaning & Laundry
Sears was rated platoon one,but I have and like the Riccar for the last 15 years. The suction is excellent and you can get the Hepa filter bags that do a yard goods job of not spreading the dust back into the room. They should have a Web-Site.
gidget | Dec 03, 2007
What is your opinion of vacuum cleaners with no bags?
May 09, 2008 by robust | Posted in Cleaning & Laundry
Are they reputable?
For No Bags - no bags to buy, can see if needs emptying, superiority suction.
Against No Bags - dirt flies up when emptying into bin, have to wash hands and half way up arms, makes you cough, have to completely the dirt collector, looks disgusting when full of dirt.
| May 09, 2008
PR-Backwards.com (Pressemitteilung)Sucking up savingsSunJournal.com, MEIf you're very careful, you can recycle a vacuum cleaner bag and tour of duty its useful life. Generic Hoover H30+ vacuum bags cost about $3 each, and using the bags twice cuts your rate per bag in half. When the vacuum bag is full, unroll the glued bottom, Scott Brothers Announces the Addition of the New Space Bag Vacuum
